Saturday, August 23, 2008

A Story of Conversion During War

Over the past week I have been reading a book I found in the library called Love Thy Neighbor: A Story of War. Written by the journalist Peter Maass, it is a memoir of his experiences in Bosnia during the first year or so of its devastating civil war (which are placed in context by references to history as well as events in the years following his departure). As one may expect, most of his anecdotes, whether personal or secondhand, are depressing in the least and disturbing at the most. There is much cause for dismay - neighbors driven to turn against each other through fear and political manipulation, rampant rape and murder of civilians, and egregiously false justifications for the bloodshed that were put forth principally by the Serbian leadership.

While the whole list causes me to cringe, the last element is particularly galling. Maass keeps pointing out how the repetition of lies was enough to convince the rest of the world to sit on its hands and excuse its passivity with the declaration, "It's the Balkans. They're all just crazy." Few believed Milosevic and Karadzic when they claimed that the Bosniaks wanted to establish an Islamic republic that would force all women to wear burkhas, commit genocide against Serbs (an ironic charge!), destroy churches and crush Orthodox Christianity. Maass provides ample testimony of just the opposite: the Bosnian Muslims were perhaps the most secular Muslims on the planet. They drank ample liquor and ate pork. They rarely attended mosque. And perhaps as many as a quarter of all marriages in Bosnia were mixed. Maass remembered watching such films as The Blues Brothers and Blazing Saddles on government television in Sarajevo. He wryly remarks, "If the Bosnian government was, as its enemy shouted, trying to establish an Islamic republic, it was moving very slowly in the audiovisual department." On the other hand, Serb paramilitaries destroyed ancient mosques and pretended they never existed and forced Muslims to deed over property while claiming they moved voluntarily. Yet the lies were repeated just enough to convince the rest of the world that it couldn't sift through the evidence and determine who shared the greatest blame.

The U.N. was a key force for blundering, incompetent neutrality. Over time, however, its policies wore down the commanders that it dispatched to Sarajevo. For the first one, as I see it, the break came when circumstances forced something of an "incarnational ministry." Philippe Morillon, the charming French general who was first called upon to carry out the U.N.'s distantly-planned policies, lived quite opulently in Sarajevo in a residence known as the Delegate's Club. He would sit to eat in a dining room decorated with a Persian rug, graced with a mahogany table, and detailed with linen napkins and crystal wine glasses. "Outside, Sarajevo was dying," Maass reminds us.

The first crack in Morillon's armor of neutrality came after Serb soldiers assassinated the Bosnian deputy prime minister while he was sitting inside a United Nations vehicle. Somehow the colonel in charge of the convoy to and from the airport thought it was okay to open the door to the personnel carrier to let the paranoid Serbs see the U.N. wasn't transporting mujahadeen. Morillon was shaken as journalists probed his failure to keep alive a man under his protection.

Two months later, the eastern enclave of Srebenica was on the verge of falling to Serb forces. Morillon put together a convoy of personnel carriers and flatbed trucks of food and medicine and took to the road. When he reached the front lines, the Serbs accused him of delivering weapons to soldiers. Morillon had to surrender his cargo and he arrived in the besieged city with only a small detachment of U.N. soldiers.

"Srebenica was one of the most desperate places on earth," Maass writes. Thousands lived outdoors because many buildings had been shelled to rubble and the rest were jam-packed. The residents fought each other desperately for parachuted food and then over the parachutes because they could be turned into blankets and clothes. But when Morillon arrived, the Serbs stopped shelling the city. 75,000 Bosnians knew Morillon was their only hope of escaping death, so they blocked his vehicles and refused to let him leave.

But after two days, Morillon himself wanted to stay. He went to the balcony of the local post office and addressed a gathered crowd. "I have now decided to stay in order to clam your anguish and try to save you," he announced. "I am here, and here I stay." The U.N. flag was raised over the post office. Maass writes, "If the Serbs wanted to conquer Srebenica, they would be forced to do it over his dead body."

Morillon became a news sensation instantly. The Serbs backed off, allowing some food and medicine in and refugees out. Eventually they agreed to the deployment of U.N. troops in Srebenica and the regular delivery of aid. But soon the Serbs started shelling the city once again. Two years later, they captured the supposed U.N. safe haven and executed over 8,000 men. As for Morillon, he was dismissed from his post shortly after defending Srebenica. He had bucked U.N. policy, and the United Nations "had no need for heroes in Bosnia."

The general after Morillon, Francis Briquemont, resigned after six months. He had come to love Sarajevo and its people and could not hold steady while enforcing U.N. policy.

Policy is usually decided by armchair intellectuals at a safe distance from the sights, sounds, and smells of war. Ministry is improvised contextually and practiced face-to-face and eye-to-eye. Living in community with people in their joys and their pains turns one from a paternalistic humanitarian to a servant of the servants of God. Morillon's experience, while not identical with Christian commitments, offers a stunning reminder that we cannot offer the transformative grace of God if we are not ourselves transformed by intimate encounter. The gospel is discovered and embraced not among mahogany tables and crystal but cracked asphalt and dirt mixed with blood. God lead us to be converted!

Labels:

Monday, August 04, 2008

Lutherans: Maybe Constantinianism was a bad idea after all...

I just found this in the Biblical Recorder, the newspaper for the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina:

Lutherans to apologize for Anabaptist persecution

(Religion News Service)

The Lutheran World Federation (LWF) is preparing a statement asking forgiveness from Anabaptists - Mennonites, Amish, and similar believers - for 16th century persecution, which included torture and killings.

The decision to prepare the statement was made by the LWF council, the world body's main governing agency, which met in Tanzania in June.

[snip]

Much of the Lutheran persecution of Anabaptists was based on writings by key figures in the Lutheran movement such as Martin Luther and condemnations in Lutheran confessional writings such as the Formula of Concord and the Augsburg Confession, which are still considered authoritative for Lutherans today.

The statement seeking forgiveness is expected to be ready for the LWF's 11th Assembly, in July 2010. The LWF represents 68 million Lutherans in 141 member churches in 17 countries, including the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

Labels: ,

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Diet for a Wealthier, More-Crowded Planet

It's not just a good idea for individual health, it's a necessary shift in thinking for humanity's collective future. Yes, we Americans need to eat less meat. A lot less meat.

This article from the Christian Science Monitor points out how growing affluence in other areas of the world is raising the demand for meat in people's diets. This diverts more grain for livestock, raising prices and leaving less for the poor. If everyone ate meat as much as Americans do, well...everyone can't. Our average diet is simply unsustainable.

A couple of years ago I made it a personal goal to eat meat only a few days of the week. I haven't succeeded yet, but I'm definitely going to try harder!

Some snippets from the article:
*****

One-third of the world’s arable land grows food for livestock, and about 36 percent of world grain becomes animal feed. The problem, say experts, is the inefficiency of converting grain to meat. A pound of beef takes 7 pounds of feed to produce. For pork, the ratio is 1 to 3; and for chicken, 1 to 2. (Cold-blooded fish, which don’t need energy to maintain body temperature, are farmed more efficiently.)

[...]

The average American eats about 275 pounds of meat per year, says the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Each American, in effect, consumes 1,765 pounds of grain yearly, says Lester Brown, author of “Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization.” Only 220 pounds of that is consumed directly in foodstuffs like bread, pasta, and breakfast cereal. The rest is through animal products.

If everyone consumed grain at this rate, says Mr. Brown, today’s 2 billion-ton world grain harvest would feed only 2.5 billion people – two-fifths of the world population. If the world ate the way Italians do – 882 pounds of grain per person yearly – we’d feed 5 billion people. And if we all ate the way largely vegetarian India does (11-1/2 pounds of meat per person yearly, or 440 pounds of grain), our grain supply could feed 10 billion.

[...]

“There’s no need for hunger in the world,” says Polly Walker, MD, associate director of the Center for a Livable Future at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Md. “There’s an equity issue here that should give us pause.”

Labels:

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Preview: The Anabaptist Prayer Book

The prayer corner in our house contains a hodgepodge of materials. I understand that the Eastern Orthodox refer to their devotional spaces as icon corners because they are dominated by the display of these beautiful "windows of heaven." I prefer the designation "prayer corner," because, well, that's the focus of such a space anyways. Our three little icons from Egypt couldn't exercise hegemony over the corner as it is! But we do have several crosses and a couple of prayer beads. Ultimately, being Reformation-rooted Western Christians, and because we're such bibliophiles, the real center of our corner is the short shelf of devotional literature. Naturally, a couple of Bibles remain in place, as well as a few classics of evangelical piety. Oswald Chambers' My Utmost for His Highest takes its place here - as, by the way, it also does on occasion during morning prayer at the local Episcopal Church. The regulars take turns giving short homilies (since we've become regulars, Kelly has been assigned next week), and one of them insists on using Chambers during his time. Just another tidbit of grassroots ecumenism. But I digress.

We love prayer books and, as a result, they constitute the bulk of the literature in that space. And, given the history of different traditions' typical practices, the prayer books stem from the "high" churches and the magisterial Reformation - Presbyterian, Lutheran, Anglican and Catholic. The reasons that the Radical Reformation churches have generally shied from such resources are well known: intentional focus on the primary study of Scripture and suspicion of "rigid forms" over "heart worship." Among some early Baptist churches, notably the "founder" John Smyth and, later, the General Baptist Thomas Lambe at the Bell Alley Church in London, even the text of the Bible was set aside after being read at the beginning. This was done so that the "spirit" of the words could be focused upon during worship. I also suspect a third reason for the lack of prayer books: many of the Free Churches either focused their evangelism upon, or had the greatest success, with less-educated and impoverished populations. Even today, Pentecostalism, now the most successful Free Church form, spreads most readily among those who have less share in the things of this world and so long for a greater share of the Spirit.

But there is nothing inherent to the baptistic project that precludes drawing upon the resources of a prayer book, while there is much that commends such practice. I have already mentioned how the origin of the Anabaptists was a kind of generalization of monastic practice. Meanwhile, if the original communitarian vision held by Baptists is to reassert itself, the one that speaks of the Church as God's gathered assembly, then there is every justification for praying in step with others and for taking up aids to piety and worship outside of one's own thoughts or ingenuity.

I am, of course, not the first person to understand this. Not by a long shot. Gathering for Worship, the British Baptist service book that I have praised previously, is the third in a line of worship aids stretching back over several decades. This wonderful resource has now been joined by another from our theological cousins the Mennonites. Last year Herald Press, the publishing arm of Mennonite Church USA, released Take Our Moments and Our Days: An Anabaptist Prayer Book, Ordinary Time. Given that there will be latent suspicions about "forms," one may not be surprised that this book is only so ambitious. As the title suggests, the prayer cycle it creates is intended for the season between Pentecost and Advent (however, a second volume for the high seasons is apparently in the works). Being Anabaptist, it thoroughly focuses on the life and example of Jesus Christ. The four-week plan focuses on the Lord's Prayer, then the Beatitudes, then the parables, and finally the miracles. The prayers are "Scripture-saturated" (as any good prayer book should be, I think) and the pattern of themes takes on an "Anabaptist coloration." At the same time, its publication exemplifies a catholic spirit of engagement with the broader Christian tradition. It should be arriving in the mail today and I look forward to making personal remarks about its contents later.

In the meantime, here are a couple of reviews from the Herald Press web site:

"It is a blessing to have a prayer book rooted in our common Christian tradition of morning and evening prayer. It is unabashedly Anabaptist while employing the best elements of Christian prayer from other ancient and contemporary Christian sources. The layout is simple and clear and holds to a consistent pattern." - Father Andrew D. Ciferni, O.Praem., Daylesford Abbey, Paoli, Pa.

"A superb prayer book! The editors have done an outstanding job choosing texts and hymns and writing prayers and forms to establish substantial patterns of prayer. Their language is that of the universal church, so this publication knits its users to Christians throughout time and space. I pray that this volume will be used widely and well." - Marva J. Dawn, author of Reaching Out without Dumbing Down.

You can also read another Roman Catholic reader's comments here at the Bridgefolk web site.

Labels: , ,

Friday, July 04, 2008

BWA Freedom & Justice Report - June 2008

Most Americans will spend this day celebrating the mythos of liberty won at great cost. For my part, I'm content to reflect on the great cost of crucifixion that won my eternal liberty. Yet I am indeed thankful that, when it comes to the practice of the gospel, America is at least more redeemed among the powers than most. Too bad we have so often squandered that redemption by buying into the seductions that America the power presents us. Nevertheless, there are Christians around the world who have much worse to contend with than we, and for them we should pray, for they face persecution in response to the freedom they have already found in Christ.



*****


Hamid Shabanov, a Baptist pastor in Aliabad in the Central Asian country of Azerbaijan, was arrested on Friday, June 20.

Elnur Jabiyev, General Secretary of the Baptist Union of Azerbaijan (BUA), reported that the “police claim to have found an illegal weapon in his home.”

Denying the allegations against Shabanov, and suggesting that the weapon was planted by the police, Jabiyev stated that the arrest “was a provocation by the police,” and that it was “a deliberately targeted action.” The BUA leader asserted that “the police's aim is to halt Baptist activity and close the church in Aliabad.”

BWA president David Coffey stated that “the BWA will do all we can to publicize among the world family what has happened in Aliabad” and that “the global family” will be praying for the Shabanov family.

General Secretary Neville Callam expressed his disappointment at the arrest. “We are registering our grave disappointment at the denial of religious freedom that is evident in Azerbaijan,” the BWA leader said. “Our Baptist brothers and sisters in Azerbaijan should be completely assured of the BWA commitment to pray for them as they struggle in the context of oppression, and, as an expression of our historic commitment to personal liberty, freedom, and justice, to make representation on their behalf.”

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Last Night

Just a year and a half ago I was more afraid. Afraid of the unknown behind next the corner ready to jump out and attack. I can remember on more than one occasion coming home to an empty apartment from school and wondering if it had been broken into and who would be waiting. I cannot even begin to tell you how irrational that fear was in a Metairie apartment. We lived in a "dangerous place" or so we were told by my wife's more affluent coworkers. What made it "dangerous" was that the street consisted of some older apartment complexes which were occupied by a racially mixed blue collar population, taxi drivers, medical workers, grocery clerks and the like. Living in a gated apartment complex only helped to encourage such stereotypes. In reality the people who we lived around were normal nice people, many with children, most who were probably more afraid of losing their jobs and their livelihood than my wife's friend's were of them. Needless to say nothing ever did jump out at me other than my own shadow and the occasional mosquito.

I cannot help but think back to that fear now as I sit in my den in our home on a lower income, mixed race, blue collar, West Bank street after the events of last night and this morning. Around 1am last night Christina awoke to a loud thump. She tried to get me to wake up by pushing on me and telling me she heard a noise. I had just been woken up by our beautiful 17 month daughter just an hour before and was not too interested in waking up again before our 5:40am alarm clock started singing its usual morning lullabies. My first still asleep response to Christina was to start mumbling. After a few more prodding I began to make comprehensible words, "I don't want to get up. I'm not getting up." But she told me to go check the noise, so begrudgingly and half asleep I started stomping around towards the kitchen mumbling about how it was not right to have to get up at this ungodly hour. Upon seeing nothing in the kitchen I promptly returned to my pillow. The next morning after I got out of the shower, Christina came into the bathroom with a somewhat confused look on her face asking me if I had left the window open last night. To which I said no. I went to check the window in the den and sure enough the blinds were pulled half way up and the window was open and there was a foot impression with tree bits on our couch. Nothing was taken however so we called in the attempted break-in to the police. It seems the would-be-intruder got startled by my loud mumblings and decided he did not want to come in after all.

After the events of this morning I spent most of my free time today thinking on the incident. What should my response be to this event? In some ways we had been violated, our sacred and secure place called home had been entered without permission. I immediately dismissed the option of having no response at all and to just ignore what happened. So this leaves me with two choices in my mind. I can ask the question how can I protect myself and my family more and close in on myself, take extra security precautions, buy bars for my windows, become paranoid about the stories I hear, etc. Or I can ask how is this calling me to love, to be Christ to my neighbor, to love my enemy. While the first option has some immediate attraction, similar to my fear from just a year and a half ago, I cannot see myself as being honest with myself and my family if I choose it. The second option seems to go against what I was raised to think, protect yourself and your family at all cost. The easiest way to help others is to throw your money at them and occasionally work in a soup kitchen. I want to protect my family. But not at the cost of their (or my) salvation. The grace that my fatherhood and husbandhood channel comes from my being Christ to and for them. If my family cannot see Christ in me what value does my fatherhood or husbandhood have?

Who was he (or her)? What did he want? Was he looking for money or a place to rest? Did he have a home? Does he live around here? Is he a victim of the vicious cycle of poverty/drugs? How could I have helped him? How could I have loved him? What more should I be doing in my community?

Christ you ask so much!

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

An excerpt from King, the public theologian and martyr...

The 40th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King's martyrdom is two days away. Here's some brief bits from one of his late sermons, "Remaining Awake through a Great Revolution":


But I say to you this morning, my friends, there were those depressing moments. How can one avoid being depressed when he sees with his own eyes evidences of millions of people going to bed hungry at night? How can one avoid being depressed when he sees with his own eyes God’s children sleeping on the sidewalks at night? In Bombay more than a million people sleep on the sidewalks every night. In Calcutta more than six hundred thousand sleep on the sidewalks every night. They have no beds to sleep in; they have no houses to go in. How can one avoid being depressed when he discovers that out of India’s population of more than five hundred million people, some four hundred and eighty million make an annual income of less than ninety dollars a year. And most of them have never seen a doctor or a dentist.

As I noticed these things, something within me cried out, "Can we in America stand idly by and not be concerned?" And an answer came: "Oh no!" Because the destiny of the United States is tied up with the destiny of India and every other nation. And I started thinking of the fact that we spend in America millions of dollars a day to store surplus food, and I said to myself, "I know where we can store that food free of charge—in the wrinkled stomachs of millions of God’s children all over the world who go to bed hungry at night." And maybe we spend far too much of our national budget establishing military bases around the world rather than bases of genuine concern and understanding.

Not only do we see poverty abroad, I would remind you that in our own nation there are about forty million people who are poverty-stricken. I have seen them here and there. I have seen them in the ghettos of the North; I have seen them in the rural areas of the South; I have seen them in Appalachia. I have just been in the process of touring many areas of our country and I must confess that in some situations I have literally found myself crying.

*****

One day we will have to stand before the God of history and we will talk in terms of things we’ve done. Yes, we will be able to say we built gargantuan bridges to span the seas, we built gigantic buildings to kiss the skies. Yes, we made our submarines to penetrate oceanic depths. We brought into being many other things with our scientific and technological power.

It seems that I can hear the God of history saying, "That was not enough! But I was hungry, and ye fed me not. I was naked, and ye clothed me not. I was devoid of a decent sanitary house to live in, and ye provided no shelter for me. And consequently, you cannot enter the kingdom of greatness. If ye do it unto the least of these, my brethren, ye do it unto me." That’s the question facing America today.

I want to say one other challenge that we face is simply that we must find an alternative to war and bloodshed. Anyone who feels, and there are still a lot of people who feel that way, that war can solve the social problems facing mankind is sleeping through a great revolution. President Kennedy said on one occasion, "Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind." The world must hear this. I pray God that America will hear this before it is too late, because today we’re fighting a war.

Labels:

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Yes, Virginia, there is a Baptist monastery...


Martin Luther's religious life centered in the worship and practice of the Order of St. Augustine until his excommunication. Five years later, he married Katharina von Bora, a former nun. They made their home in a former monastery.


Henry VIII of England received the appellation "Defender of the Faith" from Pope Leo X for writing a book that denounced Martin Luther. After pulling England out of Rome's ecclesiastical orbit, he closed the monasteries and confiscated their lands.

Protestant reformers attacked priestly celibacy as an unnecessary and unbiblical doctrine. They rejected its communal institutionalization in the form of convents and monasteries as a distraction from the real work of proclaiming the gospel. Much of the history of so-called "Protestantism" has carried forward this bias against specialized Christian communities.

Yet early in the Reformation a movement of Protestants implicitly seized upon the monastic ideal as the proper character for local Christian gatherings. The continental "Anabaptists" engaged in laicization: while medieval Catholics had distinguished between the requirements demanded of the "laity" and of the "religious," these radical reformers universalized the rigor of the latter as the high calling of all Christians. The church was not primarily the place where one went to receive the sacraments (although the dominical sacraments remained important for the Anabaptists, and they even elevated a few of their own practices to a central role) but where Christians covenanted together in a community of equal disciples who would share common work and leadership.

Other renewal movements have risen in the Church since that time. John Wesley preached the practice of social holiness and gave it a mechanism through his methodist class meetings. Lay monasticism in the Roman Catholic Church appeared in the last century when Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin chose to live in community with the poor and founded the Catholic Worker Movement. Clarence Jordan, a Baptist minister, founded Koinonia Farm so that one community of Christians could demonstrate the vision laid out in the Book of Acts.

Although Baptists themselves emerged in the religious turmoil of 17th-century England as a movement centered upon radical discipleship forged in community covenants, we are more generally known throughout contemporary Christianity as radical individualists who divide over competing claims to spiritual competence. Many among our number even celebrate this reality. Only in very few contexts would anyone consider that to be Baptist and also to be communitarian, even monastic, is not a contradiction in terms.

But the ecumenical New Monastic Movement of our time possesses deep similarities to the vision of the early English Baptists and continental Anabaptists, who themselves echoed the Desert Fathers and Mothers that fled the growing cosmopolitan Christianity of the fourth century. Absent the neo-Platonic prejudice against human sexuality and the medieval hierarchy of superior and ordinary piety, these modern intentional Christian communities exhibit a devoted way of life that no Baptist should find objectionable on the grounds of Scripture or traditional Baptist commitments. Baptists should make good monastics!

And some of them have in fact done so as individuals. Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove, a New Monastic leader and founder of Rutba House here in Durham, is a member of a local Baptist church. Other Baptists have been a part of Rutba House and Iredell House while also worshiping with Baptist congregations. Yet each house is openly ecumenical and specifically non-denominational in its inception and structure. I do not in any way cast aspersions on these communities because of their broad identity. But any participation by self-identified Baptists can be easily dismissed as incidental to their formative tradition; that is, some may say these Baptists are living in intentional community in spite of the fact that they're Baptist and not because their own theological heritage has provided the resources to envision this way of discipleship.

But what if, in fact, the Baptist tradition has done just that? During the New Baptist Covenant meeting in Atlanta I attended a breakout session on peacemaking directed by Glen Stassen, a professor of ethics at Fuller Seminary, and Paul Dekar, a professor of evangelism and missions at Memphis Seminary. Paul Dekar is a Baptist who has been practicing intentional community for some time. I learned that although he is an American, he has participated in the creation and ongoing work of Holy Transfiguration Monastery in Australia. Are you ready for this? Holy Transfiguration - believe it or not - is an active and tithing member body of the Baptist Union of Victoria. The community fully embraces and remains grounded in its Baptist origins. At the same time, it is also vigorously ecumenical, attracting members from various Christian traditions who, once they join, do not feel compelled to consider themselves Baptist. The community's ecumenism extends to its embrace of traditional monastic and liturgical forms, such as the Christian year, the daily offices, and even religious habits.

After attending the session, I purchased Paul Dekar's brand-new book about the monastery, entitled Community of the Transfiguration: The Journey of a New Monastic Community. I look forward to reading their story in what little free time I may have for this book. My prayers go out to HTM for their witness in Australia, and I hope that their example may be an inspiration for Baptists and for all Christians who are discerning how to live more faithfully.

P.S. - According to this blog, HTM is one of two Baptist monasteries in the world. I wonder what the other one may be...

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

New Year, New Economics?

For much of my semi-adult life, economics has stood out in my mind as a discipline that is, in its very maddening way, simultaneously practical and relevant but also opaque and confusing. The stock market is only now starting to make sense to me...well, I think. Perhaps I shouldn't put too much money on that. Or should I say, I won't invest in that option. Who knows?

But ever since participating in a wonderful Manna and Mercy retreat at Duke upon the conclusion of my first year of study, I have been burdened by the sense that Christian theology and discipleship must shape me to take economics seriously. I realized that most of us who claim Christ's Lordship have not asserted it adequately when matters of GDP or personal finance arise. Sure, we believe in simple and accessible virtues such as generosity and moderation in our consumption of the world's goods, but economics appears too complex to us for us to attain systematic and articulate rigor. So it seems we adopt slogans from our trained positions on the political spectrum without really knowing what they mean or if they're true. That is, a Christian who tends to be politically conservative may talk of trickle-down economics and will assert that "a rising tide lifts all boats." A Christian who tends to be politically liberal speaks the language of class warfare and "two Americas."

Imagining that the free market and socialism are the only viable options for a sensible economics that will generate wealth and prosperity, we quickly find ourselves stuck. Soviet-style economies fell apart in the twentieth century and the countries that still carry the socialist banner are plagued by poverty, corruption, and authoritarian rule. Yet unmitigated capitalism is spiritually corrosive. Here in the United States, we are increasingly plagued by materialism, socioeconomic divisions, and monetary evaluations of success and happiness. Meanwhile, our sense of community and place is shattered by our status as a mobile - and upwardly-mobile - culture. And we're not any happier for our outstanding wealth.

Does the Christian tradition offer an alternative to this catch-22? I am growing more hopeful that it does - and that this alternative is sensible and applicable and not merely an otherworldly utopianism. I do not believe that a Christian take on economics is going to win the day anytime soon, or perhaps anytime ever - but I think it calls for us to present a critique to our prevailing social and cultural assumptions when it comes to money and resources. This is part of what leaders in the "New Monastic" movement call living on the fringes of Empire. What are some of the voices that give me hope?

1. Catholic Social Teaching and "Distributism." - I first learned about distributism this past summer while living at Koinonia. It all began when a fair-trade coffee roaster who operates out of Americus, GA, spoke one evening at the church where I worshiped. When asked about living an alternative economics, he suggested we read Small is Beautiful by E.F. Schumacher. The book appeared nearly thirty years ago and was a critique of traditional assumptions by a major economist in Britain. Google searches on Schumacher led to the discovery of a group of generally traditionalist Catholics who speak favorably of him, as he was a convert to Catholicism and his economic ideals reflect their own thoughts. The distributists take their cues from a set of papal encyclicals written around the turn of the twentieth century and from the writings of G.K. Chesterton, among others. In short, distributism favors the broad distribution of property and capital and encourages the development of fairly self-sufficient local economies.

See The ChesterBelloc Mandate for one helpful and thorough distributist site.

2. Neo-Agrarianism - I'm a born and raised city-slicker, and so when I first heard the term "agrarian" the natural suspicion of my kind bubbled up in my thoughts. I imagined nostalgic idealists who romanticized farming and who ignored the educational and economic difficulties of rural living while despising the cultural and social opportunities afforded by cities. This shallow critique can be readily found anywhere one may turn, but ultimately it's just not true. Yes, agrarians like Wendell Berry highly value farming as a cultural and even spiritual practice, but their goal isn't to empty the cities and destroy professional vocations that don't involve hoeing weeds. Rather, the main objective is to reorient our cultural terrain so that everyone - rural, urban, and suburban - appreciates and values our undeniable dependence upon, and connection with, soil and air, flora and fauna. Of course, agrarianism goes deeper than this, with concrete interest in renewing agriculture, conserving land, and reconstructing community life. I've recently discovered that the agrarians and the distributists are essentially on the same page, even though they may have somewhat different emphases. The agrarians, for example, give more attention to restoring family or community farming.

I recommend reading The Essential Agrarian Reader.

There's more that could be said, but since I haven't posted anything in a while, I'll just go with this and introduce more as I keep learning, studying, and reflecting.

Labels:

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

When Baptists reconcile....

Here's an encouraging story from the news page on the web site of the Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia:

*****

One more Break-away congregation comes back

On June 24th a special service took place at the First Baptist Church in Stalin’s home city of Gori. This particular congregation had spent 7 years in separation from the Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia. The split was caused by the undermining activities of fundamentalist groups in Germany namely Friedensbote represented by somebody called Viktor Rogalski. They had stirred up the congregation against Ecumenical movement of which Evangelical Baptist Church is an active part.

The congregation was founded in Soviet time. It was the second Georgian speaking Baptist Church to be established in Georgia. For a long period of time the church was led by the Revd Vladimir Songulashvili, later senior pastor of the Cathedral Baptist Church and Bishop of Tbilisi region.

A statement signed by all the members of the congregation was read before the service started. It said: “After seven years of estrangement we come back to the Evangelical Baptist Church of Georgia and admit that it was wrong and sinful to break away from the Church for which we seek forgiveness both the Lord and the Church of Georgia. We would like to forget the past and think of the future...”

The Archbishop and the President of the EBCG re-consecrated the church building and than anointed all the members of the congregation with oil as a sign of the renewal of the church. At the end of the service the Archbishop Malkhaz celebrated the Eucharist in con-celebration with the President and representatives of the regional clergy.

In Georgia everything ends with a party. At the party the toast-mastership was carried out by Revd Sulkhan Murmanishvili, a newly appointed interim minister of the Gori congregation.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Beth Newman on the Priesthood of All Believers

In worship we discover that we are engrafted into the story of God. It is in worship that we acquire the skills to recognize who we are - sinners. In Trinitarian worship, we also acquire the skills to discover and live our identity as priests, an identity centered in blessing and offering, or receiving and giving. We receive the forgiving and sacrificial love of Christ, and are enabled to extend this to others through intercession and service. Paul Fiddes describes this ecclesial identity well when he states that the church as a priestly people has the 'power to serve, to focus the presence of the Spirit and to mediate blessing only because it is caught up in the life of the triune God'. To be caught up in the life of God is most certainly a gift of God's grace, one mediated to us through the material Body of Christ. With Schmemann, we need to emphasize that in the church the sum is greater than the parts, not because of human effort but because of the presence of the risen Christ who freely uses 'the created order in the work of redemption, particularly the gathering and building of the church'. The priesthood of all believers is not an internal, spiritual phenomenon, but an ecclesial form of life, sustained by the faithful worship of God.

- Elizabeth Newman, "The Priesthood of All Believers and the Necessity of the Church," in Recycling the Past or Researching History?: Studies in Baptist Historiography and Myths. Anthony R. Cross and Philip E. Thompson, eds. Carlisle: Paternoster, 2005. Final italics mine.

Labels: , ,